Yearly Archives: 2007

Local Online Site left at the Alter

Posted on Wednesday, March 14, 2007 by No comments yet

The local Fox affiliate in Dallas and local online favorite Pegasus News enjoyed a brief courtship recently. However, as they planned the wedding, Fox’s parent (Fox HQ in NYC) balked at an item in the pre-nup and nixed the whole affair. Alas.

However, Pegasus offers an intriguing glimpse (as well as the Local Onliner) into the details of the proposed partnership. This is one model of how local established media can work with new local online efforts, focusing on sharing content and driving traffic to each other (no revenue sharing).

Seven Trends in Journalism

Posted on Wednesday, March 14, 2007 by No comments yet

Thanks to Dan Gillmor for pointing out what he labels “a must-read for anyone who cares about the present and future of journalism”…

The Project for Excellence in Journalism has issued its annual State of the News Media report. This year’s identifies seven major trends.

The seven trends are:

  • News organizations need to do more to think through the implications of this new era of shrinking ambitions.
  • The evidence is mounting that the news industry must become more aggressive about developing a new economic model.
  • The key question is whether the investment community sees the news business as a declining industry or an emerging one in transition.
  • There are growing questions about whether the dominant ownership model of the last generation, the public corporation, is suited to the transition newsrooms must now make.
  • The Argument Culture is giving way to something new, the Answer Culture.
  • Blogging is on the brink of a new phase that will probably include scandal, profitability for some, and a splintering into elites and non-elites over standards and ethics.
  • While journalists are becoming more serious about the Web, no clear models of how to do journalism online really exist yet, and some qualities are still only marginally explored.

Lost and Found: Dog and Glasses

Posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2007 by No comments yet

Front Porch Forum is often used as a lost and found among neighbors… keys, cell phones, cats, hats and gloves. This week it was dogs and glasses.

From The Addition Neighborhood Forum:

Hello Neighbors – Yesterday while walking my dog I took off my dark glasses (prescription bifocals and very new) and put them in my jacket pocket because they were fogged up. Somewhere en route they fell out of my pocket. If you spy them, could you please give me a call? Many thanks.

Three days later… success!

Hello – Thank you to the neighbor who retrieved my glasses and got them back to me. Great neighborhood to live in!

This past week a member of the South Union Neighborhood Forum posted:

A woman who lives [nearby] had someone break into her apartment which resulted in her dog escaping through a window that was left open by the intruder. Please be on the look-out for her very friendly 2 year old dog. The dog is a border collie mix, black/brown/white, wearing a blue collar. If found or seen anywhere, please call her. She is also offering a reward.

At the same time, a member of the adjacent Summit Neighborhood Forum wrote:

Found Dog! I know I have seen this dog in the Summit Street neighborhood with owner but don’t know who you are?! The Dog is a multi-colored Border Collie?! Beautiful Dog and very friendly. Please call me to claim.

Good news… word spread from one neighborhood to the next and the connection was made:

Thank you all for your phone calls. The dog found in the Summit Street area was the dog lost in the So. Union area and safely returned. Dog and Owner are re-united. Thank you all again.

Seems that word spreads from one neighborhood forum to another through various means… this merits further study.

No Neighborhood is an Island

Posted on Monday, March 12, 2007 by No comments yet

Each week brings another neighborhood forum or two across the threshold of success… very exciting for Front Porch Forum.

Now we’re seeing a rise in demand for a secondary service across neighborhood forums. E.g., a woman lost her dog and posted the message on her neighborhood forum. An hour later, a different person posted a note in an adjacent neighborhood forum saying she had found a dog of the same description. Should we have formal way of making that connection?

In this case, informal took over. People talk about what they read on their forums… it’s interesting micro-local stuff. So folks talked over the water coolers or via email or whatever and within an hour or two the connection was made and dog and owner were reunited… a great happy ending.

We’ve also seen examples of an issue occurring at the intersection of multiple neighborhood forums. The topic is raised on all the relevant neighborhood forums, but it only really catches on in one. After a dozen postings, that one neighborhood has moved the issued forward… but what about all those people in the other neighborhood forums?

E.g., Burlington is looking at reworking the very steep block of Cliff Street between S. Willard and Summit Streets. An announcement was posted on the Summit, South Union and DeForest neighborhood forums… but only the DeForest members have really delved into the issue on their forum. Should we have some mechanism for connecting those neighborhoods around this issue?

There’s a technology fix for this kind of thing, but I’m afraid any increase in complexity will move Front Porch Forum from a widely adopted service to one that is only accessible to the tech elite. So, we have four solutions to offer now:

1. Informal… a member of one neighborhood forum asks a list of folks across other neighborhood forums to each post his message to his/her forum. This approach is being put to good use now. This carries the added benefit of the messages coming from a resident of each neighborhood instead of being broadcast by some likely unknown “outsider.”

2. As a participating local official to post the message across all forums in his/her district. This is also used, and, while easier to implement, is in turn a notch less effective.

3. Nearly every neighborhood forum has one or more Neighborhood Volunteers… essentially forum boosters. These folks are knit together across the county by an online forum too. So, a person could become a Neighborhood Volunteer and then share their message with the 200 or so NVs and ask them to pass it on on their forums.

4. We’re developing a message-for-a-fee feature, something like a classified ad, whereby members will be able to post in other neighborhood forums (in a very limited way) for a fee.

Neighborhood Forum too Small/Big/Just Right!

Posted on Monday, March 12, 2007 by No comments yet

The majority of Front Porch Forum members that we talk with list the small scale of their forum as a leading attraction… “how could I not subscribe to my neighborhood’s forum?”… especially when the forum area includes just a few hundred nearby households.

That said, some areas are difficult to parse into reasonably sized neighborhood forums, e.g., tightly packed urban areas and thinly spread rural locations… where does one “neighborhood” end and another start?

We also are finding that while most of our now 4,000 local subscribers are happy with the service as is, some would have us rework their neighborhood forum’s boundaries… bigger, smaller, cut in two, join with the next one over. In fact, in some forums we hear each of these views from various members. That doesn’t make them invalid – no, no. All of this feedback is important and we’re soaking it in and working toward the best next steps we can take. This is the case in Charlotte, VT where we’re hearing every different angle.

Also, the ONE East Neighborhood Forum in Burlington has seen a surge in popularity and now has more than 200 households on board out of about 1,000 homes there. The 200 are great… it’s the 1,000 that’s too big. People tell me that they don’t know and don’t imagine that they’ll ever meet many of the people who post messages… 1,000 seems too big of an area for our mission of helping neighbors connect and foster community within the neighborhood.

Social Networks squeeze NGOs?

Posted on Sunday, March 11, 2007 by 1 comment

David Wilcox writes from London this week about how nonprofits, associations and trade unions are surrendering ground to social networking websites. Reminds me of online citizen journalism taking a bite out of newspapers. Wilcox:

It used to be that you joined associations because it was a way of meeting like-minded people and getting help, facilities, information and other things difficult or costly to organise for yourself. These days it is much easier to find people and resources online, and to mix and match these assets into project teams, communities of practice, and informal networks.

Further, he cites a forthcoming report from the NCVO ICT Foresight team:

The connections that ICT facilitates suggest that some organisations may increasingly be bypassed and that power may shift away from top-down hierarchical organisations and towards more fluid and participative networks where there is less need for a centralised ‘bricks and mortar’ coordinating organisation.

Leon Benjamin, author of Winning by Sharing, is even more explicit:

I think the problem is leadership. The reality is that leaders of VCOs and NGOs aren’t equipped to lead in the 21st century’s networked economy. And this isn’t their fault, but they need to accept help from people who can create the conditions that enable leaders to emerge, and then step aside. This isn’t their time now.

Just before he died, Peter Drucker said at Davos in Switzerland, “community-building talent is the single most precious resource in the modern world.” Let me briefly explain why.

Online community service poviders like Ezboard and CommunityZero, and Bebo and MySpace, to a certain extent have created leaders who in some cases, have literally started movements, with huge numbers of supporters and advocates. EzBoard has over half a million discrete ‘clubs’, each with a leader, covering a vast array of subject matter. These leaders often deliver an experience that enriches people’s social and professional lives. More so than the associations and unions that are supposed to serve them. These are our leaders of the future.

Newspaper and local online

Posted on Saturday, March 10, 2007 by No comments yet

The Local Onliner shared some great tidbits this week from the Inland Press Association (IPA) meeting:

Most newspaper Web sites have been focused on driving new audiences, but McClatchy sees a gold mine in its existing print circulation. How many local media outlets have 40 percent penetration in this age of fragmentation?  [McClatchy] noted that 70 percent of the print audience never touches the Web site in a 30 day period.

And I like this approach to forming strategic alliances:

As for forming partnerships with various Internet players, Hendricks [McClatchy executive] is all for them. You can’t look at these people as enemies, because they are the environment, he says.

Finally, some interesting details from Boston.com about local online:

Also speaking at IPA, and again, fully blogged by Owens, was Bob Kempf from Boston.com. I’ve written extensively about his efforts, but Kempf reveals new details of research showing why Boston.com is focusing on becoming a local information hub (watch out Yellow Pages!). Only one in three users and one of five non-users are happy with their current options for finding local information, he says. But access to local information doubles the likelihood that non-users will visit Boston.com. The research also found that 50 percent of users like the idea of getting all their information in one place.

I’ve heard from many Front Porch Forum subscribers that they love turning to their neighbors for a wide variety of local needs through their forum.

I know community when I see it

Posted on Saturday, March 10, 2007 by No comments yet

What, exactly, is community?  Can you define “neighbor?”  The guy next door?  Sure.  Around the corner?  Maybe.  Turns out academics have been debating such questions for some time.

Kevin Harris’ blog pointed me to an article by about such matters in Symbolic Interaction.  Here’s her abstract:

This article investigates the practices and functions of neighboring. It is based on interviews and “go-alongs” with over sixty residents and on ethnographic observation of two middle-class neighborhoods in Hollywood, California. Building on Lofland’s (1998) model of three social realms (the public, the parochial, and the private), I conceptualize neighboring as a set of interactive principles that characterize parochial or communal territories such as neighborhoods. I discuss four distinct patterns in detail: friendly recognition, parochial helpfulness, proactive intervention, and embracing and contesting diversity. While integrating previous research and theorizing on neighboring, the article contributes to the continuing debate in sociology over what constitutes community.

So, while we have Kevin in London bringing some U.S. research to light, Lloyd Shepherd recently listed U.S.-based Front Porch Forum on his blog from London… ahh the internet.  Thanks Lloyd!

Smalltown and i-neighbors going places

Posted on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 by No comments yet

Smalltown.com landed $3M in new funds recently to ramp up it’s model of local online.  Peter Krasilovsky reports:

Smalltown [is] an IYP site with social aspects via reviews, calendars and (now) Top 10 lists. Five months after launching SME-oriented sites in San Mateo and Burlingame, Smalltown has announced three new Bay Area locales, added video uploads, hired a VP of Sales, and begun a Google campaign.

This is a very interesting effort:

Usage-wise, Rucker says he’s got 3.5 percent of the launched communities visiting on a weekly basis. About 1.8 percent have registered, which gives them the right to review sites, etc. Rucker is aiming for a registered base of three percent.

After six months, Front Porch Forum has about 17% of Burlington, VT registered.

And I just heard that i-neighbors has a new version of their service up and running, although I don’t have any details.

U-G-L-Y Bloggers have no Alibi

Posted on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 by No comments yet

Winner of the Vermont-bloggers-are-not-the-most-photogenic-lot essay contest? Philip Baruth, hands down:

Never have so many wonderful people, filled with so many lovely ideas, produced so many aesthetically questionable photographs.

And did he really have to include so much damning evidence to make his case? Seven snapshots and 677 words… I can mount no defense… guilty as charged.

P.S. It was a great event:

In no particular order, we had a full Seven Days contingent, with Freyne and Resmer (as well as mini-Resmer); the men of Green Mountain Daily (J.D. Ryan, Jack McCullough), as well as an erstwhile man of GMD, Odum; Neil Jensen and unflappable friend Oliver; Charity Tensel and Haik Bedrosian; the reclusive Yusef; Jason Lorber and Max, his extremely cool son; Michael Wood-Lewis, of the Front Porch Forum; Bill Simmon, who kicked off the event with a spontaneous Youtube seminar; and many more.