That title is a clever quote from Britt Blaser’s latest post. Thanks to David Weinberger for pointing in that direction. Blaser writes:
The People Law trumps the Power Law. There are five principles I’m playing with lately:
1. The size of your audience confers limited power
2. A network’s value is the square of its nodes (Metcalfe)
3. Network nodes are significant only when they’re verbose
4. Most conversation is among nearby nodes
5. Only interactions count, and the richest count most
I recommend a visit to check out the charts and graphs and his detail… good stuff. Most of these points jibe with what we’re finding with Front Porch Forum. E.g., under point three he states that the purpose of online social networking is face-to-face interaction. That’s what Front Porch Forum is all about… and it works because the people on the online network by definition live in the same neighborhood.
The City of Burlington will host its 7th annual Neighborhood Night of Success March 29, 2007, 5:30-7:30 at City Hall. This is a great event and I recall attending the first one fondly.
Beth Truzansky works for the Center for Community & Neighborhoods in Burlington’s Community and Economic Development Office. She received a record-breaking 68 nominations for the night’s Neighborhood Leader Awards this year. She shared some quotes today.
“Not only is Helen a leader on her street she is also a teacher and has helped to educate many generations of college students about what it means to be a good neighbor. Helen deserves to be recognized because despite the set backs she has faced over the years she has not given up and continues to be devoted to the idea and practice of building and sustaining community.”
“Stuart works tirelessly in his garage/workshop inventing, developing, and producing human-powered vehicles that can be used by people around the world that have handicaps though disease, war, or birth defects. He is humble, hardworking, entrepreneurial, and very generous. During the summer he can often be seen out on Linden Terrace with some of his vehicles. Neighborhood kids come out and road test the vehicles. It’s really wonderful to know that in addition to the kind and caring neighbors we have that there are also folks who are driven to solve problems and make the world a better place for the less fortunate.”
“Leonard is not your ordinary school custodian – far from it! Barnes’ teachers and staff have now become very familiar with his vast array of hidden talents and skills, especially those which result in putting a smile of the face of a student – his specialty. He routinely fixes even the most stubborn zippers on coats, repairs wheels on scooters, and handles all bicycle problems. Leonard routinely volunteers himself to chase kick balls that have bounced their way across North Street, or to climb up on the roof of the building to retrieve a ball that has gotten stuck. Once the ball is back in play, it’s not at all unusual for Leonard to join in on the fun for a few rounds of kickball with the kids, much to their collective delight.”
“Roberta has an open heart for the community and provides a listening ear for all she meets. Everyone is welcome when Roberta is around and she has reached out to members of the community that others might avoid, if you know what I mean. This is who I recommend as the good neighbor around here.”
“Patrick, an accomplished wheelchair athlete, volunteers tirelessly (more than 20 hours per week) to ensure others with physical disabilities have access to adaptive sporting equipment and athletic opportunities he has motivated, inspired and provided the resources many children and adults (including many Burlington residents) to try recreational opportunities they had never heard of let alone thought they would enjoy and enabled people typically relegated to spectator status to become fully-participating individuals for the first time.”
“Megan has always had the best intentions of those around her at heart. She has worked tirelessly to help senior citizens, her neighbors, and her friends. Megan is well known in the Old North End as someone there to help organize change, to bake you a loaf of bread, or to help shovel your driveway. We are proud to have her as our neighbor.”
“Barb was our first friend in Burlington. She greeted us upon our arrival one hot, sticky day in Burlington last summer and has been a constant in our lives ever since. She helped us move in, paint our walls, clean our yard and walk our puppy. Oh wait, I forgot to mention that Barb is only 13 years old!”
“Heather’s work is endless and students in our school and in our neighborhood seek her out for support, guidance and learning. She is a valuable member to our community and above all exceeds in everything she does. Her heart is gold and her ideas, thoughts, creativity and actions make Burlington a better place to live!”
“I thought of Elizabeth for this award because, on the morning our recent Valentine’s Day Blizzard, I saw her walking up Church Street from Main through drifts of snow to open her bookshop (Everyday Bookshop) for the day. We were practically the only people on the street*That snowy morning seemed to me to showcase Elizabeth’s incredible dedication, and it reminded me that in her quiet, unassuming way, she exemplifies the rare, old-fashion values of a merchant totally committed to serving her customers. I consider her “a living treasure” of Burlington.”
Celebrate the people that make Burlington a great place to live, work & play.
The U.S. Green Building Council and various partners are developing an environmental rating system for neighborhoods… similar to what they’ve been implementing for a decade or more concerning buildings. In their words:
The LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System integrates the principles of smart growth, urbanism, and green building into the first national standard for neighborhood design. LEED certification provides independent, third-party verification that a development’s location and design meet accepted high standards for environmentally responsible, sustainable, development.
This is important work… getting into detail about suburban sprawl, distance, stormwater runoff, wetlands, etc. But what of community?
I’m encouraged that the pilot version of the rating system prefers “open communities” vs. “gated” ones. And it rewards infrastructure that promotes community, like sidewalks and dense development. I didn’t see anything about front porches, but I was skimming and could have missed it.
I encourage the good folks involved with this seemingly very complex process to get even more explicit about fostering community within the neighborhood. Scoring high on this rating system would indicate strong environmental performance and say something about the potential for being a decent place to actually live… but is it a friendly place full of good neighbors?
I posit that one well-oiled Front Porch Forum can do more for environment and community than whole collections of sidewalks, solar panels and official open space. Our neighborhood, I’d guess, would score well since it was laid out in the 1920s… dense, mixed use, walkable within and to just about everything in town, lots of front porches! However, old-timers here report that it warmed up considerably once Front Porch Forum kicked into gear.
Now since the success of the neighborhood forum, it’s not unusual for a neighbor to call around offering to pick up items at the grocery before driving there, saving several car trips. And one stroller typically is used by three or four families before cycling out. Neighbors have a stuff-sharing list… canoes, lawn mowers, ice cream makers… why own one if you can borrow instead (and, of course, loan your stuff occasionally). And people use Front Porch Forum to turn out the neighbors for environmental actions all the time… clean-up days, public meetings, protests, etc.
So, I suggest that a neighborhood with a strong sense of community is highly desirable and that should be reflected in the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System. How about a Front Porch Forum in every neighborhood! 😉
Each week brings another neighborhood forum or two across the threshold of success… very exciting for Front Porch Forum.
Now we’re seeing a rise in demand for a secondary service across neighborhood forums. E.g., a woman lost her dog and posted the message on her neighborhood forum. An hour later, a different person posted a note in an adjacent neighborhood forum saying she had found a dog of the same description. Should we have formal way of making that connection?
In this case, informal took over. People talk about what they read on their forums… it’s interesting micro-local stuff. So folks talked over the water coolers or via email or whatever and within an hour or two the connection was made and dog and owner were reunited… a great happy ending.
We’ve also seen examples of an issue occurring at the intersection of multiple neighborhood forums. The topic is raised on all the relevant neighborhood forums, but it only really catches on in one. After a dozen postings, that one neighborhood has moved the issued forward… but what about all those people in the other neighborhood forums?
E.g., Burlington is looking at reworking the very steep block of Cliff Street between S. Willard and Summit Streets. An announcement was posted on the Summit, South Union and DeForest neighborhood forums… but only the DeForest members have really delved into the issue on their forum. Should we have some mechanism for connecting those neighborhoods around this issue?
There’s a technology fix for this kind of thing, but I’m afraid any increase in complexity will move Front Porch Forum from a widely adopted service to one that is only accessible to the tech elite. So, we have four solutions to offer now:
1. Informal… a member of one neighborhood forum asks a list of folks across other neighborhood forums to each post his message to his/her forum. This approach is being put to good use now. This carries the added benefit of the messages coming from a resident of each neighborhood instead of being broadcast by some likely unknown “outsider.”
2. As a participating local official to post the message across all forums in his/her district. This is also used, and, while easier to implement, is in turn a notch less effective.
3. Nearly every neighborhood forum has one or more Neighborhood Volunteers… essentially forum boosters. These folks are knit together across the county by an online forum too. So, a person could become a Neighborhood Volunteer and then share their message with the 200 or so NVs and ask them to pass it on on their forums.
4. We’re developing a message-for-a-fee feature, something like a classified ad, whereby members will be able to post in other neighborhood forums (in a very limited way) for a fee.
The majority of Front Porch Forum members that we talk with list the small scale of their forum as a leading attraction… “how could I not subscribe to my neighborhood’s forum?”… especially when the forum area includes just a few hundred nearby households.
That said, some areas are difficult to parse into reasonably sized neighborhood forums, e.g., tightly packed urban areas and thinly spread rural locations… where does one “neighborhood” end and another start?
![]()
We also are finding that while most of our now 4,000 local subscribers are happy with the service as is, some would have us rework their neighborhood forum’s boundaries… bigger, smaller, cut in two, join with the next one over. In fact, in some forums we hear each of these views from various members. That doesn’t make them invalid – no, no. All of this feedback is important and we’re soaking it in and working toward the best next steps we can take. This is the case in Charlotte, VT where we’re hearing every different angle.
Also, the ONE East Neighborhood Forum in Burlington has seen a surge in popularity and now has more than 200 households on board out of about 1,000 homes there. The 200 are great… it’s the 1,000 that’s too big. People tell me that they don’t know and don’t imagine that they’ll ever meet many of the people who post messages… 1,000 seems too big of an area for our mission of helping neighbors connect and foster community within the neighborhood.
What, exactly, is community? Can you define “neighbor?” The guy next door? Sure. Around the corner? Maybe. Turns out academics have been debating such questions for some time.
Kevin Harris’ blog pointed me to an article by Margarethe Kusenbach about such matters in Symbolic Interaction. Here’s her abstract:
This article investigates the practices and functions of neighboring. It is based on interviews and “go-alongs” with over sixty residents and on ethnographic observation of two middle-class neighborhoods in Hollywood, California. Building on Lofland’s (1998) model of three social realms (the public, the parochial, and the private), I conceptualize neighboring as a set of interactive principles that characterize parochial or communal territories such as neighborhoods. I discuss four distinct patterns in detail: friendly recognition, parochial helpfulness, proactive intervention, and embracing and contesting diversity. While integrating previous research and theorizing on neighboring, the article contributes to the continuing debate in sociology over what constitutes community.
So, while we have Kevin in London bringing some U.S. research to light, Lloyd Shepherd recently listed U.S.-based Front Porch Forum on his blog from London… ahh the internet. Thanks Lloyd!
Ghost of Midnight is an online journal about fostering community within neighborhoods, with a special focus on Front Porch Forum (FPF). My wife, Valerie, and I founded FPF in 2006... read more